Acknowledging shared info
The user wrote a Chinese sentence about this season's Champions League chances created per game, mentioning players like Mbappé, Foden, and Wirtz. It looks like they might be sharing a news highlight! I think a good approach would be to provide some context or definitions, like explaining what "chances created" means. I might also ask if they’d like more details, maybe even list other players in the top 10 or offer to visualize data with a chart.Defining chances created

I want to keep my response short, so I’ll define "创造机会" as chances created, which means key passes plus assists. When it comes to football analytics, that’s a common definition. I might mention that the stats could be sourced from something like Opta for UCL.
If the user wants, I can also offer to break down stats like expected assists or key passes for those players. I could create a simple graphic if they provide more data, or I can quickly summarize each player’s contributions in a bullet list.Crafting a response
I’d like to say something like: “挺亮眼。 '创造机会' usually means key passes plus assists (according to Opta). This leaderboard shows that the three players made the most goal-scoring opportunities in this season's Champions League. Would you like to see: 1) a complete top 10 list and their gaps; 2) the distribution of the three players (crosses, through balls, set pieces); 3) a comparison with last season or league stats; or 4) a small shareable graphic? If you provide the raw data or give permission to retrieve, I can complete that!”
有意思的数据!“创造机会”一般按 Opta 口径=关键传球+助攻,反映为队友制造射门的能力。姆巴佩4.0次/场、福登3.5次、维尔茨3.4次都很顶了。
需要我进一步整理吗?
如果要更详细的数据,我可以基于你给的原始表格处理,或在你同意的情况下去检索权威来源。
Copyright 2024 虎扑体育直播 - 虎扑官网 - 虎扑NBA All Rights by 虎扑体育